<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confirmed &#8211; Mac OSX 10.6 runs on Intel only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaj-it.com/10424/confirmed-mac-osx-106-runs-on-intel-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaj-it.com/10424/confirmed-mac-osx-106-runs-on-intel-only/</link>
	<description>Bringing you the latest gadget &#38; tech news, how-to&#039;s, reviews and shopping deals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeMoh</title>
		<link>http://www.gaj-it.com/10424/confirmed-mac-osx-106-runs-on-intel-only/comment-page-1/#comment-26177</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeMoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaj-it.com/?p=10424#comment-26177</guid>
		<description>I wonder how Mac fanatic people are receiving this by now.

Apple totally gave up to the IBM compatible platform for which Intel develops its processors. And we all know it is mainly a PC platform.

This is another shift from Apple toward a point at which it will totally convert to a software developer, exactly like its definite competitor, Microsoft. 

With Apple&#039;s giving up its hardware development to PC hardware companies, I believe the day PCs will run Mac OS officially will not be so far from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Mac fanatic people are receiving this by now.</p>
<p>Apple totally gave up to the IBM compatible platform for which Intel develops its processors. And we all know it is mainly a PC platform.</p>
<p>This is another shift from Apple toward a point at which it will totally convert to a software developer, exactly like its definite competitor, Microsoft. </p>
<p>With Apple&#8217;s giving up its hardware development to PC hardware companies, I believe the day PCs will run Mac OS officially will not be so far from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarySims</title>
		<link>http://www.gaj-it.com/10424/confirmed-mac-osx-106-runs-on-intel-only/comment-page-1/#comment-26176</link>
		<dc:creator>GarySims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaj-it.com/?p=10424#comment-26176</guid>
		<description>I think when Leopard came out it was generally understood that it would be the last version of OS X that supported the PowerPC Macs. Having said that PowerPC based Mac owners don&#039;t need to despair as applications with Leopard support will be around for a while. I just installed Safari 4 on mu OS X Tiger (10.4) 450Mhz PowerPC Mac. Works fine.

Since Snow Leopard is Intel only the binaries that ship with it don&#039;t have to be universal which is why an install of Snow Leopard gains 6GB of disk space... All the PowerPC code has been stripped out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when Leopard came out it was generally understood that it would be the last version of OS X that supported the PowerPC Macs. Having said that PowerPC based Mac owners don&#8217;t need to despair as applications with Leopard support will be around for a while. I just installed Safari 4 on mu OS X Tiger (10.4) 450Mhz PowerPC Mac. Works fine.</p>
<p>Since Snow Leopard is Intel only the binaries that ship with it don&#8217;t have to be universal which is why an install of Snow Leopard gains 6GB of disk space&#8230; All the PowerPC code has been stripped out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 285/286 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.gaj-it.com @ 2012-02-10 08:01:58 -->
